Monday, September 04, 2006

Time in a Bottle

As I do with so many donations to the Library, I grabbed a stack of new acquisitions and sat at a PC, entering the new cataloguing information into the Library's database. This is a dull task in most other situations, but I like doing it at the Library: I get to handle the music, look at who wrote it, where and when it was published, even read the lyrics.

As can be detected in my other posts, I prefer music published in the early 20th century. I know it's often trite, culturally obtuse, and not very experimental, but it appeals to me as few current genres of music do. Maybe I'm susceptible to nostalgia: in, say, 1918, would I have been considered something like Samuel Siegel's "Ragtime Echoes" as modernistically offensive as some of my contemporaries?

Whether it is simply a passing phase of our decadent art culture or an infectious disease which has come to stay, like la grippe and leprosy, time alone can show

Etude magazine critic Edward Baxter Perry, quoted in This Is Ragtime by Terry Waldo

Among the new donations (the treasure of a garage in Stockton, California) were several piano albums, the kind amateur musicians use when they need the basic melody and lyrics to popular songs. I started at the top of the stack, the most recently published selections. These were mostly from the early 1970's, with the apparently requisite puffy lettering and Peter Max illustration style on the covers. The song titles were certainly familiar to me: they were played on the radio frequently when I was a kid–"One Tin Soldier," "Bad Bad Leroy Brown," "Delta Dawn"; the soundtrack of stagflation– and I probably know them better thanks to ceaseless TV ads for the K-tel hits collections.

As I entered the data for these songs I started feeling gloomy. I wondered why I felt so less intrigued by this music. Was it because, even at the time, I thought the early Seventies was one of the most aesthetically repulsive eras of human history? Yet, as I created a new catalogue entry for "The Entertainer," I remembered that the time wasn't all bad. We got another Ragtime Revival, for instance, thanks to Marvin Hamlisch's anachronistic score for The Sting. But the next entry was for an annoying piece called "Dreams of an Everyday Housewife." Reading the patronizing lyrics for this one, which I don't remember on the hit parade at all, helped me understand why Ms. magazine was founded about the same time.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you were listening to music in 1918 at your current level of musical experience I bet you would have thought "Ragtime Echoes" crass. Of course, it would depend on your upbringing and the musical choices you would have made as an adult.

It's fair to say that the "Dreams of an Everyday Housewife" might have been a bigger hit in other times when the lyric was more in line with public thought. Which begs the question: Would you want to go back to 1918 and deal with the sex roles of the day? Waaay more songs of the "...Housewife" variety were aired then. :(

-Bink

4:03 PM  
Blogger Melanie Archer said...

Waaay more songs of the "...Housewife" variety were aired then. :(

"Aired," not to mean, of course, broadcast on the radio.

I agree that there is hugely offensive sexism to be found in early 20th c. popular music. But was it as smug as these early Seventies lyrics? That's what irritates me: at least songwriters in the Teens weren't pretending to be sensitive to woman's plight.

4:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello, my name is Melanie Archer too. LOL I googled my name & found your site.

9:24 PM  
Blogger Melanie Archer said...

Or you Googled our name :)

11:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Melanie--

It was good to meet you last week in the Library. I'm sorry I was so distracted by the (hopefully temporary) problems of "everyday" life. I really like what you've written here. It echoes what I have felt about working in the Library all these years. As you may know, I've written about it also over they years, but I appreciate your slant which is more descriptive than mine. So, I hope to see you again soon!

later,
John Tenney

10:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home